![]() 2:23-cv-01213-AMM) after attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process. Security Engineers, Inc., Civil Action No. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ( EEOC v. Such conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employers from discriminating based on sex. Security Engineers’ corporate officers and managers complied with clients’ discriminatory requests for male security officers, the agency alleges. The EEOC charged that since at least March 1, 2017, Security Engineers has discriminated against a nationwide class of qualified female applicants by refusing to hire or assign them to security officer positions because of their sex, despite many class members’ extensive experience in the private security industry or law enforcement. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit announced today. Security Engineers, Inc., a Birmingham, Alabama-based company specializing in contract security services which operates in at least 14 states, violated federal law when it denied female applicants employment and job assignments because of their sex, the U.S. More information is available at Stay connected with the latest EEOC news by subscribing to our email updates.BIRMINGHAM, Ala. ![]() The EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. The EEOC's Birmingham District Office is responsible for processing discrimination charges, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Alabama, Mississippi (except 17 northern counties) and the Florida Panhandle. One of the six national priorities identified by the EEOC's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP) is for the agency to address emerging and developing issues in equal employment law, including qualification standards that discriminate against individuals with disabilities. "Under the ADA, an individualized assessment of an employee's ability to perform his job duties safely is required before prohibiting employees from taking medications prescribed to treat and manage their disabilities." "Many of these employees had been taking their medication for several years without incident prior to Army Sustainment's implementation of its policy banning use of certain prescription drugs," said Marsha Rucker, regional attorney of the EEOC's Birmingham District Office. ![]() "The EEOC will continue to vigorously enforce all aspects of the ADA's employment provisions, especially its prohibition against policies that screen out employees with disabilities and prevent them from working." "Federal disability law protects many employees who have medical conditions," said Bradley Anderson, district director of the EEOC's Birmingham District Office. The agency seeks back pay as well as compensatory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief for a class of individuals who were adversely affected. ![]() 1:20-cv-00234-SRW) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process. Army Sustainment, LLC f/k/a L-3 Army Sustainment, LLC f/k/a Army Fleet Support, LLC, Civil Action No. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Such alleged conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). According to the suit, some employees switched to less effective medications to keep their jobs, while others left their jobs rather than comply. According to the EEOC's suit, beginning in 2016, Army Sustainment prohibited all use of certain prescription medications during both work and non-work hours, including certain pain control medications, without regard to whether the medication interfered with an employee's ability to work safely. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it filed today.įrom 2003 to 2018, Army Sustainment was a government contractor providing aviation maintenance support to the United States Aviation Center and United States Air Force at Fort Rucker, Ala. Army Sustainment, LLC violated federal law when it required employees to discontinue taking medications prescribed by their physicians to treat their disabilities as a condition of maintaining their employment, the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |